From the comic strip “Non Sequitur” for 5-29-12:
Scene: little girl and her talking stuffed pony are in bed.
Little Girl to Pony: “What makes you think there is a monster under the bed?”
Pony: “I thought I heard something . . .”
Pony continues: “. . .so there just might be something down there, which means it could be a monster, so to be on the safe side, we should assume there is something under the bed that wants to eat us.”
As I read this I thought, “I’ve heard something like this before.” Yes, it is the reasoning (at least in public) of the “climate change” alarmists. The phrase “global warming” doesn’t play all that well in some contexts, so now it is “climate change.” The only thing that has changed, however, is the name.
Whatever they wish to call it, this is the reasoning pattern of the climate change people. While it is funny in a comic strip, it is not so funny when the climate change people use it, because they add another step. After they reach the “climate change is going to eat us” conclusion, they go on to reason (and I use that term loosely), “So therefore we need a large, intrusive, liberty-killing, interventionist government to regulate everything we do.”
I would much rather crawl under the bed and take my chances with the monster.